The phrase "actually contested" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is genuinely disputed or challenged, often in a formal or legal context.
Example: "The results of the election were actually contested by several candidates, leading to a recount."
Alternatives: "truly disputed" or "genuinely challenged."
Of those 1.5 million citations, only five percent are actually contested.
Like ski ballet, which, incredible to think, was actually contested at the Winter Olympics as a demonstration sport in both 1988 and 1992.
When measured by viewership and the number of prime-time hours that the networks devote to them, the conventions have been on the wane since the days when there were actually contested battles on the floor for the nomination.
Ms Suu Kyi went from dissident to parliamentarian, and then announced her wish to become president.But for that to happen, given that the army reserves control of a quarter of the parliament, the NLD would have to win nearly two-thirds of all the seats that are actually contested.
And throughout the interpretation, not only of the current version of 168, but prior versions of the contest statute, this and other courts have looked not at the entire type of ballot that may have been involved but only those ballots that were actually contested by a party.
Imagine, however, what might happen under two longshot conditions: a California primary that is actually contested, and featuring candidates like them with the money to compete.
No facts were actually being contested and what the family really wanted was to get an interlocutory injunction banning the book indefinitely.
Could a World Cup actually be contested without Argentina for the first time since 1970?
The principal fallacy in argumentation is the petitio principii ("begging of the question"), in which the speaker presupposes that the audience accepts a thesis that actually is contested by them, even implicitly (See also logic: The critique of forms of reasoning).
Unlike many of his followers today, Holmes was sufficiently skeptical of his own exclusive ability to discern the truth that he insisted that judges should not use their undemocratic power to impose supposedly objective (but actually, vigorously contested) principles of right and wrong on a deeply divided nation.
This might seem a straightforward question of geography, but you explain in the book that the exact borders have actually been contested since the early twentieth century.
