The phrase "actual tariffs" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the real or current rates of tariffs imposed on goods and services in trade.
Example: "The actual tariffs on imported steel have increased significantly over the past year."
Alternatives: "current tariffs" or "real tariffs".
Some of the round's doubters have questioned its value because it promises no substantial further reductions in actual tariffs, merely aiming to limit countries' scope to raise them.
But interviews with Trump's trade advisers leave no doubt that this is a kind of theatre — a bluff, which, they believe, will achieve their aims without actual tariffs.
Even the likes of India or Brazil will have more exceptions and will cut their tariff limits by less than the rich.Most developing countries set actual tariffs far below the legal ceilings, but this makes matters worse, not better.
After the liberalising wave of the past two decades, in which countries decided to open their economies without waiting for others to do likewise, there are now big gaps between actual tariffs and allowable ones.
Regarding manufacturing, she insisted that India and Brazill) not merely lower their subsidy ceilings, but that they do so to such an extent as to bring the actual tariffs down below current levels.
So far, industrialised country exporters have turned their noses up at the tariff bindings offered by developing countries in the negotiation since they often don't lower the actual tariff rates.In financial terms, tariff bindings are options.
It was demonstrated that the model is useful for predicting the actual tariff usage and rating.
Welfare changes associated with moving from the actual tariff to approximations of the optimal pricing system are computed under different tariff scenarios.
The predictions of these models are, therefore, the result of a choice model that has been calibrated by actual tariff decisions, including consumers' biases and irrationalities.
Further, the selection of sectors is more appropriately addressed in the current study using the actual tariff reduction announcement in the agreement.
Three different regulatory design options are analysed with a model developed to estimate the evolution of self-supply deployment as a function of price by: (i) starting with the actual tariff structure and parameters; (ii) introducing a new network usage component for rate-payer energy suppliers, and (iii) evolving towards higher allowed revenues recovered through fixed charges under the tariff.
