The phrase "actual discourses" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to real or genuine discussions or conversations on a particular topic.
Example: "The study focused on actual discourses surrounding climate change, highlighting the various perspectives presented by experts."
Alternatives: "real discussions" or "genuine conversations".
The extent to which the actual discourse has influenced praxis and how effective it has been is more difficult to determine but we conclude that, within a context of 'incorrigible' problems, small steps have been made towards taming an untameable beast.
It's simply an easier (non) argument to make than having an actual discourse.
But Habermas takes a further step, insisting that (U) is a principle of real discourse: an individual's moral judgment counts as fully reasonable only if it issues from participation in actual discourse with all those affected.
At the same time, these idealizing presuppositions have an operative effect on actual discourse: we may regard outcomes (both consensual and non-consensual) as reasonable only if our scrutiny of the process does not uncover obvious exclusions, suppression of arguments, manipulation, self-deception, and the like (2003a, 108).
This means that much of the actual discourse between elected officials and citizens originates from the citizens.
The few million people tuning into Fox and tuning out any opposing take on reality are in dire need of a dose of actual discourse, not just one extremely slanted view.
After all, the actual, difficult discourse must evolve in Turkey, and not in France, or Switzerland.
Platonists argue against the various versions of paraphrase nominalism by pointing out that they are also out of step with actual mathematical discourse.
In doing so, I articulate a view about how my own ongoing work on global justice can be seen as a contribution to an actual global discourse.
Among the mentions in our sample, the overwhelming majority (94.5%) take this form, providing strong evidence that connectivity among and between users in these two groups represents actual political discourse rather than simply third-person references.
