The phrase "actual abundances" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the real or true quantities of something, often in scientific or statistical discussions.
Example: "The study aimed to compare the predicted abundances of species with the actual abundances observed in the field."
Alternatives: "true abundances" or "real abundances".
Relative qPCR measures the differences in abundances of the target DNA or RNA (reverse-transcribed to cDNA) between samples without showing their actual abundances, and the comparison can only be done for samples run within the same qPCR reaction.
This estimate is much higher than the actual abundances (870 1523 individuals per 10 cm) in our comparable non-seep sediments at a similar depth of 1450 m.
This revealed that the noncitrullinated peptides are detected in roughly 100-fold higher amounts (shown in Figure 5 by the approximate average ratio of 0.01), but this does not reflect actual abundances because the arginine-containing peptides will be detected much more efficiently due to their higher basicity and thus ionization efficiency [ 18].
The actual "Abundance" was moved several times until being taken under the wing of the Municipal Art Society's Adopt-a-Mural program in 2001.
The apparent scarcity of Earth-like worlds probably has nothing to do with their actual abundance.
Accuracy is defined here as the closeness between the estimated and the actual abundance levels of input molecules.
The % C4-grass pollen slightly underestimates the actual abundance of C4 grasses at sites with high proportions of C4 grasses, which can be corrected using regression analysis.
These signals clearly do not provide accurate information about the actual abundance of message, as we have shown previously using PCR on samples collected by LCM [18].
The proteins with the 6 highest ion intensities, which should not be confused with actual abundance, were vitronectin, complement component 9, apoE, clusterin (apoJ), TIMP-3, and serum amyloid A1.
While the summarized percentage of identified taxa at rank genus is roughly the same in both datasets, the actual abundance of specific genera differs between both datasets (Figure 3).
Many metagenomic repositories contain assembled DNA sequencing reads, which may skew the interpretation of the actual abundance of the organism of interest as opposed to the total number of raw sequence reads.
