The phrase "acts of third parties" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, business, or formal contexts to refer to actions taken by individuals or entities that are not directly involved in a particular agreement or situation.
Example: "The company is not liable for any damages resulting from acts of third parties."
Alternatives: "actions by external parties" or "deeds of outside individuals".
The Learning Lodge Terms and Conditions, like the T&Cs for many online sites and services, simply recognize that fact by limiting the company's liability for the acts of third parties such as hackers.
The employer will also be liable for the acts of third parties (such as suppliers) in certain circumstances and where they fail to protect their employees after the discrimination becomes known to them.
The same passage in the Court's opinion also indicates that the grant recipient had notice from state "common law" that "they may be held responsible under state law for their failure to protect students from the tortious acts of third parties". But no one suggests this means that notice of a federal grant condition can somehow be provided by state law.
However, he said there was no evidence that Ms Jackson had done anything wrong, but instead it appeared she was being prevented from fulfilling her role as guardian through the "intentional acts of third parties".
It indicated that a restaurant owner must take appropriate measures to protect persons on the premises from foreseeable criminal acts of third parties.
8.1 The obligations of the City as expressed and agreed to herein are not subject to release or discharge due to any contingencies, including, but not limited to, clerical errors, computer failures, late mailings or the failure to comply with reporting due dates or other scheduled due dates due to adverse weather, acts of God, acts of third parties or compliance with court orders.
The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (c 31) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that significantly reformed the common law Doctrine of Privity and "thereby [removed] one of the most universally disliked and criticised blots on the legal landscape".
The parties do not intend for any third party to have any rights under this Agreement by virtue of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 or otherwise.
It received the Royal Assent on 11 November 1999, coming into force immediately as the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
The doctrine of privity was significantly reformed by the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, which received the Royal Assent on 11 November 1999 and "thereby [removed] one of the most universally disliked and criticised blots on the legal landscape".
With the passing of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 on 11 November 1999 the doctrine was significantly altered, and it now allows a third party to enforce the terms of a contract if the third party is specifically authorised to do so by the contract or if the contractual terms "purport to confer a benefit" on such third party.
