The phrase "acts of gross indecency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to refer to inappropriate or immoral behavior, often in relation to sexual conduct.
Example: "The defendant was charged with acts of gross indecency, which raised serious concerns within the community."
Alternatives: "indecent acts" or "lewd behavior".
Greater Manchester Police confirmed Mr Talbot remains on bail in relation to one previous count of indecent assault, but that no further action would be taken regarding other allegations of indecent assault and inciting a child to commit acts of gross indecency.
Within five years, Wilde found himself convicted of "committing acts of gross indecency with certain male persons".
Homosexuality remained a punishable crime: 270 British soldiers and 20 officers were court-martialed for "acts of gross indecency".
On 19th May 1897, Oscar Wilde was released from prison after two years' detention for acts of gross indecency.
His Ugandan partner, Albert Cheptoyek, 33, faces a more serious charge of up to seven years' imprisonment for "acts of gross indecency" under Ugandan law, which outlaws homosexuality.
Working from trial transcripts and other sources, Kaufman made a beautiful play about Wilde's 1895 conviction for "acts of gross indecency with other male persons".
Defining the difference between simulated buggery, of the kind seen on stage at the National Theatre, which staged Romans in Britain in December 1980, and an act of gross indecency in real life, he said: "Pretending to commit an act of buggery is not an act of gross indecency merely because buggery itself is an act of gross indecency.
He ruled, therefore, that there was evidence to go to jury that pretending to commit an act of buggery might be an act of gross indecency.
"It is the simulation of the conduct which actually occurs which must be proved to be an act of gross indecency".
In January 1981 a summons was taken out by Mrs Whitehouse against Mr Bogdanov, accusing him of procuring an act of gross indecency between two actors in the play.
The letter was a writ accusing him of having "procured an act of gross indecency by Peter Sproule with Greg Hicks on the stage of the Olivier Theatre" contrary to the Sexual Offences Act of 1956.
