Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "acts explained" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a description or clarification of specific actions or behaviors, often in a formal or instructional context.
Example: "In the report, the acts explained provide a clear understanding of the procedures followed during the investigation."
Alternatives: "actions clarified" or "deeds described".
Exact(2)
"We are here to look for people breaking rules or criminal acts," explained Uwe Stellmacher, a policeman who clearly wasn't sure if he had witnessed either.
They were actually fairly small acts," explained Dr Alden.
Similar(57)
"Hostility may be lurking beneath the surface in the absence of kind acts," explains Masini.
In the book, Walton profiles a diverse group of people who launched remarkable second acts; explains why everyone in their 50s should be prepared for difficult change; and offers a three-step blueprint for reinvention, based on the life experiences of the people interviewed.
In "the present emergency," the act explained, "the national interest requires... that the Federal Government give assistance to education for programs which are important to our defense".
The Trust can act, explained one official, "to test rigorously any proposals from the BBC to get the tanks out of the garage and start heading off towards lawns.
Troopers were sent to training classes on cultural diversity and traffic stops, and State Police bulletins left little room for misinterpretation: "The race or ethnicity of a suspect, in other words, may play no part in an officer's decision to act," explained the New Jersey State Police Search and Seizure Review in the fall of 1996.
(As a student, I had not only enjoyed several instances of copulation — albeit with Mr. Goodwrench staring down at me — I had seen the act explained on huge blackboards, so that there could be no doubt about what was going on).
Kate Finlayson from the Aboriginal Legal Service in NSW and the ACT explained how it works to VICE.
In a two-page statement explaining these developments, Chief Justice John Roberts — who wrote the 2013 decision that weakened the Voting Rights Act — explained that the public shouldn't read into the court's decision not to hear the case.
Republican state senator Glenn Grothman, a major champion of the charge to repeal the Act, explained to Daily Beast reporter Michelle Goldberg, "You could argue that money is more important for men".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com