The phrase "actors utility" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the usefulness or functionality of actors in a particular situation, such as in theater, film, or performance analysis.
Example: "The director emphasized the importance of understanding each actor's utility in conveying the story effectively."
Alternatives: "performers' effectiveness" or "actors' functionality".
This study is based on interviews with households, business actors (utility service, retailer, maintenance firm) and policy actors.
For example, within "characters participating", maximum utility was obtained from "real actors" (Utility = 0.230), whereas the utility of avatars was lower (Utility =−0.208).
Thereby individual actors' utility maximisation through rational choices, ideally, leads to an optimal resource allocation in society at the national and even international level [ 17, 18].
Thereby, ideally, individual actors' utility maximisation on the demand side as well as the supply side results in an optimal resource allocation and production in society [ 4, 15, 16].
While traditional economics are contingent upon individual actors each acting to maximize their own utility, collectively producing aggregate trends, actual aggregate behavior is distinctly based upon the interactions of individuals, producing aggregate trends that are not reflections of single-actor utility maximization.
This is, in effect, the individual and public actor long-term utility, though not the apparent enterprise actor utility.
In order to gauge the implications of the anticipated paradigm shift for the electricity system, new reference architectures and assessment methodologies shall be developed to properly capture the interactions between the different actors (especially utilities, operators, energy aggregators, end-users, etc).
In a series of thought experiments, actors compute their utility of contributing a specific statement to the discourse by following ideological criteria, preferential attachment, agenda-setting strategies, governmental coherence, or other mechanisms.
One should distinguish between the utilities of the individual actors, and the "combined utility" of the whole market.
A particular allocation of resources by an actor reflects his utility and use of resources at the time of allocation.
In principal-agent theory, the GP is seen as a rational actor who maximizes utility, but there has been considerable divergence in which motivators that are considered relevant in the utility function [ 3, 23].
