The phrase "actor power" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the influence or authority of an actor, particularly in the entertainment industry or in discussions about social or political movements.
Example: "The actor power in Hollywood has shifted significantly, with more stars using their platforms to advocate for social change."
Alternatives: "celebrity influence" or "performer authority".
But perhaps the reason the production was so shockingly bad was it represented the last gasp of uninhibited actor power in theatre.
Data were analyzed using a conceptual framework based on four components (actor power, ideas, political contexts, issue characteristics) to assess national factors influencing priority for surgery.
In the years since the embargo was launched, we have done business with bad actor power abusers like Saddam Hussein and have courted the friendship of Saudis, whose money and sovereign soil gave sanctuary to most of the villains that attacked us on 911.
Actor power derived from possession of specialized skills and certain personal characteristics were also exercised (Gibson et al. 2005).
We need creative ways to capture rapid evolution in the nature of interventions, and the forces that have shaped this evolution, such as actor power, information exchange and market competition.
To apply two pillars of a framework (38) for global priority of health issues to a national stage, the alignment of actor power – the strength of those concerned with the issue, with the political context, enabled the political acceptance of the National Mental Health Policy and Strategic Plan.
"Bad actors" are a problem, but the deeper problem is the context that gives "bad actors" power.
Lack of a preventive disease management culture, limited recognition of interdependencies among activities of actors, power inequalities, and top-down and linear approaches in information and knowledge sharing are identified as key structural problems that are underrated by the actors.
What we are witnessing now is the emergence of a new social contract, in which individuals give the state (and, frequently, other actors) power over information in exchange for security and the conveniences of living in the modern world.
We examine the performance of water user associations (WUAs) and the role of actors, power relations, socio-institutional dynamics, and context in supplying water to poor urban and peri-urban neighborhoods of Malawi's two major cities.
However, the fact remains that it is, and always remains, in the actors' power to choose what they will or will not do at every performance.
