Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "actor of a" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear what context you are trying to use it in, as "actor" typically refers to a person who performs in plays, movies, or television, and "of a" does not complete the thought.
Example: "He is the actor of a leading role in the film" would be incorrect; it should be "He is the actor in a leading role in the film."
Alternatives: "performer in a" or "character in a".
Exact(33)
Sure, that's the actor they want, but are they really not just depriving a deserving British actor of a job?
Every actor of a certain generation had stories about their time in rep – playing Malvolio one week and a police sergeant the next.
It was deft and somehow poignant, an illustration of the delicate dance required in Hollywood, even — or perhaps especially — for an actor of a certain stature.
How is it possible that I can be Nicolas Cage, most mumblingly, intensely earnest actor of a generation, yet the IRS should be forcing sales of my property?
As the lead actor of a No. 1-rated sitcom, Mr. Sheen is that rare commodity in today's Hollywood — a bankable and irreplaceable star — and his public crackup has come at perhaps the most valuable point in his career.
It goes without saying that he is an actor of a high order, and some finely wrought moments glitter like multifaceted gems, as when Lear comes out of unconsciousness and recognizes the long-absent Cordelia.
Similar(27)
Overall, current evidence underlines renal endothelial hypoxia as the actor of an important profibrotic vicious circle in CKD progression.
McKINLEY: Brian, the character of James Tyrone is an actor, of course, a veteran actor, a man of sizable personality and appetites.
But the process for an actor of shooting a movie is so ridiculous.
For actors of a certain masculine bent, James Bond has long been viewed as a career pinnacle.
But there are hints, brought by actors, of a better-integrated Dylan musical to come.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com