The phrase "actor model in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in discussions related to computer science, particularly in the context of programming paradigms or concurrency models.
Example: "The actor model in distributed systems allows for better scalability and fault tolerance."
Alternatives: "actor model within" or "actor model of".
It may encourage scientists to swiftly come up with increasingly complex but conceptually premature models, involving poorly understood assumptions or mechanisms and too many additional adjustable parameters (for a discussion of a related problem in the context of individual actor models in the social sciences see Schnell 1990).
A rigorous approach towards formalising and analysing the actor model can help us in determining relations among actors more effectively and efficiently.
The basic idea is to propose formalism in constructing an actor model based on the characteristic features for modelling and analysing relation among actors in a social network.
Examples include using: Java, C++,.NET, Objective-C, or Scala Classes; threads or processes; Promises/Futures or Actors, for use in the actor model of computation; or XSLT or XPath, for use in XML-based languages.
Design of a GAMPSON was presented in "Generic actor model for a professional social network" along with distinct characteristic features of actors such as personal information, activity, etc.
Our semantics exploits the isolation inherent in the actor model: since no actor can access the state variables of other actors, and since actors execute only one message server at a time, the effect of executing a statement is not observable by other actors.
But as more neighbourhood of an actor is considered, there is significant improvement in the relation for actors with our actor model than without actor model (from first neighbourhood up to fourth neighbourhood).
An actor model based on actor's professional information, activity, etc., is difficult to address, and also dynamic data variations, changing relations and varying privileges imposes complexities in actor modelling.
If an actor model is a good approximation of the real world social network actors, then a definitive assurance about the actor model gives us confidence in the real world realisation.
Investigation of the social actor model of information systems through an empirical exploration of communication information technology (ICT) was carried out [43] and results suggested that the social actor model can be conceptualised in three dimensions such as interaction, affiliation and environment.
