Moderate and low physical activities correlations were poor and non-significant [29].
The level of TRF2 as well as hPif1 correlated positively with telomerase activity (correlation: P=0.0455 and r=0.8856 for TRF2 and P=0.0128 and r=0.9514 for hPif1, respectively).
P1 motility, however, underwent a substantial shift in organization; while cells continued to exhibit highly correlated spatial regions of persistent activity, correlation maps revealed cells that exhibited multiple isolated spatial domains of high correlation (Fig. 8H, left, middle).
Self-report is often not the ideal method of capturing true physical activity, as it has been shown to be poorly correlated with accelerometer-defined physical activity (correlation coefficients of 0.2-0.4 0.2-0.457].
A good structure-activity correlation was observed for the assumption that these compounds behave as activated electrophiles (see Figure 5) that react selectively with biochemically-significant thiol moieties.
The new method – called interspecies activity correlation – therefore builds on these earlier findings, and extends the approach to examine the extent to which the brain activation patterns observed in humans correspond to those of monkeys.
The paper provides a review of the concept of activity correlation in Activity correlation section.
