The phrase "active intensity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to physical activity, exercise, or any situation where a level of engagement or effort is being described.
Example: "The workout focused on maintaining an active intensity to maximize calorie burn and improve cardiovascular health."
Alternatives: "dynamic effort" or "high engagement level."
The impedance and field of active intensity were then obtained.
The irrotational component of the active intensity was found using the Helmholtz decomposition theorem.
Pressure and pressure differences measured using closely-spaced microphone pairs enable the calculation of active intensity directions.
Acoustical variables including sound pressure, particle velocity, active intensity and sound power are calculated by using multichannel inverse filters.
This is a simple consequence of the active intensity at the interior downstream being not space-dependent as long as it is plane wave.
The derived energy governing equations are second-order differential equations which predict the time and space averaged energy density and active intensity distributions in a rod.
In fact, surface and interior temperature, day night variations, onset of activity, percentage of active surface, intensity of different gas and dust fluxes are needed to select safe orbits around the comet and to optimize the scientific return.
In this method, the instantaneous and time-averaged active acoustic intensity vectors are evaluated from the time-domain and frequency-domain acoustic pressure and acoustic velocity formulations, respectively.
The application of this approach is illustrated by the three components of the active acoustic intensity vector and the energy densities for different types of 3D-probes cofsisting of 4 6 microphones.
Error sensing strategies investigated include the minimization of acoustic potential energy density, acoustic kinetic energy density, total acoustic energy density and mean active sound intensity at a point and the minimization of the sum of each cost function at a number of points in the near field.
All plants were grown at 22 °C, 50%% relative humidity and 24-h illumination by cool white fluorescent light at a photosynthetically active radiation intensity of ∼125 µE m−2 s−1.
