The phrase "activated regardless" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something will be activated without consideration of other factors or conditions.
Example: "The system will be activated regardless of the current settings."
Alternatives: "activated no matter what" or "activated in any case".
This revision ensures that Swi5 is activated to 1 by its transcription factor, Mcm1, and then activated to 2 after Cdc20 is activated regardless of the activation level of Clb2, since reduced inhibition from Clb2 cannot dominate the level of transcription of Swi5 anymore.
Thus, differential activation of the extrinsic pathway downstream of DR4 and/or DR5 could be a better predictor of the tissue-specific responses elicited by p53 activation in human patients, as compared with activation of p21 or some mitochondrial apoptotic factors, which seem to be activated regardless of outcome in various scenarios.
We found that both meanings of an ambiguous word are activated regardless of the different ROMs.
Meanings of the same syntactic category are exhaustively activated regardless of contextual congruity.
The males' neurons, meanwhile, were activated regardless of the species that made the calls.
The results indicated that both meanings of an ambiguous verb were activated regardless of contextual biases and the degrees of semantic relatedness between the associated meanings.
If the RELATEDNESS-TRIGGERED SEMANTIC CO-ACTIVATION HYPOTHESIS holds true, then ambiguous words with high ROMs and those with low ROMs should display distinct patterns of semantic activation: meanings that are closely related would be co-activated regardless of the contextual bias while meanings that are not closely-related would be selectively activated depending on the contextual support.
For both low-ROM and high-ROM words, the associated meanings are co-activated regardless of contextual congruency.
Exhaustive semantic activation of a word was found on Mandarin words of varying ROMs suggesting that meanings associated with the same phonological and orthographic representations would be co-activated regardless of the degree of semantic relatedness between the meanings.
On the other hand, when the meanings associated with an ambiguous word are both syntactically licensed (e.g., being of the same syntactic category), they can be co-activated regardless of the semantic congruity with the context.
To sum up, the present study found that when lexical ambiguity is defined as meanings that share both orthographic and phonological lexical forms, these meanings can be co-activated regardless of contextual support as long as they are syntactically licensed by the sentential context.
