actions that have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "actions that have" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the effects or consequences of specific actions in various contexts, such as academic writing, reports, or analyses. Example: "The study focused on actions that have significant impacts on environmental sustainability."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The actions that have already been taken are not impressive.

The New York Times

But it is France's actions that have caused most anger.

The Guardian

And the actions that have been proposed are not final".

The New York Times

Many patriotic people have carried out or supported actions that have been harmful to their country.

The New York Times

But it is his actions that have helped him garner attention as the party's mouthpiece.

The New York Times

Mr Lederman then spins through several examples of actions that have an effect the objector would construe as sinful.

The Economist

JEFFREY H. SPIEGLER Cleveland, Oct. 2, 2013   Mr. Bernard has given numerous examples of government actions that have bred distrust.

The New York Times

This follows days of intense rocket fire from Gaza and Israeli airstrikes, actions that have yielded casualties on both sides.

The New York Times

"We are deeply saddened and disappointed in his actions that have led to the events of this afternoon.

The New York Times - Sports

The 2005 law is just one example of Congressional actions that have reduced gun-industry liability and gutted consumer protections.

The New York Times

And why does the public feel entitled to an apology for actions that have absolutely no effect on their lives?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "actions that have", ensure the sentence clearly identifies the subject performing the actions and the specific consequences or attributes resulting from them. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "actions that have" in sentences where the actor is unclear. For instance, instead of "Actions that have been taken are not impressive", specify who took the actions: "The government's "actions" are not impressive."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "actions that have" functions as a relative clause, where "that" introduces the relative pronoun and "have" connects to a subsequent verb, expressing a relationship between actions and their effects. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is usable in written English to discuss effects or consequences. The examples demonstrate its use across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

38%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "actions that have" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction to describe actions and their related outcomes or characteristics. As Ludwig AI underlines, it's appropriate for formal writing across varied contexts, including news, science, and academic discourse. The most common mistake to avoid is ambiguity; ensure the actor is clearly identified. Alternatives like "measures that possess" or "steps that entail" can add nuance, but the basic phrase remains a versatile tool for precise communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

activities that involve

Replaces "actions" with "activities" focusing more on the process, and replacing "have" with "involve".

measures that possess

Changes the focus from 'actions' to 'measures' and uses 'possess' instead of 'have', altering the emphasis slightly.

interventions that produce

Replaces "actions" with "interventions", which focuses on specific purposeful actions, and exchanges "have" for "produce".

steps that entail

Replaces 'actions' with 'steps' and 'have' with 'entail', suggesting a more procedural or sequential aspect.

initiatives that yield

Swaps "actions" for "initiatives", focusing on proactive steps, and substitutes "have" with "yield" to emphasize outcomes.

operations that cause

Changing "actions" to "operations" implies a more technical or planned process; "cause" highlights a direct effect.

choices that bring about

Replacing "actions" with "choices" emphasizes agency, while "bring about" focuses on the consequences of those choices.

deeds that encompass

Substitutes 'actions' with 'deeds' for a more formal tone and 'have' with 'encompass', implying a wider scope.

moves that trigger

"Moves" is a more general term than "actions", and "trigger" suggests a specific, often immediate, response.

policies that create

Using "policies" instead of "actions" shifts the focus to a formal set of guidelines; "create" emphasizes a direct result.

FAQs

How can I use "actions that have" in a sentence?

Use "actions that have" to describe steps or measures that have resulted in a specific consequence or effect. For example, "The "actions" that have been implemented aim to improve air quality".

What are some alternatives to "actions that have"?

You can use alternatives like "measures that possess", "steps that entail", or "deeds that encompass" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "actions that have"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase "actions that have" is a relative clause construction where "that" introduces a clause modifying "actions", indicating actions possessing a certain attribute or effect.

What's the difference between "actions that have" and "actions that address"?

"Actions that have" generally refers to actions that have already occurred and resulted in something, whereas "actions that address" refers to actions taken to deal with a specific issue or problem.