The phrase "actions outcome" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete or incorrect combination of words that lacks clarity.
Example: "The actions outcome of the project was not what we expected."
Alternatives: "results of actions" or "outcome of actions".
This bias in the SOPs use was somehow compensated by sources of resilience that contributed to the actions outcome.
A standardized chart review form was used to record the following: start date of event, dermatological history, medication, morphological description, localization, histopathological and immunohistological information if available, working diagnosis, additional investigations, topical and systemic therapeutic actions, outcome of event, and any available information on rechallenge.
An interesting question is whether temporal outcome uncertainty interacts with specific action – outcome delays during this re-constructive process.
This re-constructive process integrates contextual and sensory information to infer on the action – outcome association and may contribute to establishing action – outcome associations under conditions of temporal outcome uncertainty.
Retrospective binding is thought to reflect post-hoc inference on agency based on sensory evidence of the action – outcome association.
Compared to "action only" trials in "variable outcome timing" blocks, subjective action time in "action + tone" trials for which the action – outcome delay was 50 ms or 450 ms did not show the shift towards the outcome observed for the action – outcome delay of 250 ms.
A top-down process could re-construct action awareness by integrating prior knowledge and sensory evidence of the action – outcome association.
This context-dependency suggests a model-based, top-down re-constructive process that shifts action awareness based on previously experienced action – outcome intervals.
Indeed, a recent study found no action binding at a fixed action – outcome delay of 50 ms at all (Walsh & Haggard, 2013).
This suggests that sensory evidence of the action – outcome association is weighed flexibly, depending on the temporal predictability of the outcome.
Trials with shorter and longer action – outcome delays were necessary to build a context of temporal uncertainty in the "variable outcome timing" condition.
