The phrase "actions of speech" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the various ways in which speech can be expressed or performed, often in discussions about communication or linguistics.
Example: "The actions of speech can greatly influence how a message is received by the audience."
Alternatives: "speech acts" or "verbal actions".
Among the actions of speech, divisive speech means speaking in a way as to aggravate conflict and divide friends from each other.
Buddha criticises this view, saying that the actions of mind are most criminal, and not the actions of speech or body.
In the Upālisutta dialogue of this Majjhima Nikāya text, Buddha contends with a Jain monk who asserts that bodily actions are the most criminal, in comparison to the actions of speech and mind.
He signed most of the rulings that shaped the new political system, such as those related to popular sovereignty, representative and republican principles, separation of powers, publicity of the government actions, freedom of speech and the bases of political federalism.
Karuna is embodied and expressed through actions of body, speech, and mind, intended to protect others from suffering and its causes, or to help to alleviate suffering that may be present for them.
The implication is that he will thus retain a certain freedom of action and of speech.
What was the outcome? 5. Create a timeline showing the history behind controversial Supreme Court issues such as abortion, affirmative action, freedom of speech and civil rights.
"It is difficult to find many bright spots in the lives of Persian women.... Their liberty of movement, of action, and of speech is curtailed...
Thomas Jefferson was elected the next president in 1800; Lewis cites this as an example of the American public's dissatisfaction with Adams' actions against freedom of speech.
You have the power of the body -- the source of all action; the power of speech -- the source of all expression; and the power of the mind -- the source of all thought". Our actions, obviously, have the most direct impact on others.
Thus, just as action without speech runs the risk of being meaningless and would be impossible to coordinate with the actions of others, so speech without action would lack one of the means by which we may confirm the veracity of the speaker.
