The phrase "actions of persons" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing behavior, conduct, or activities performed by individuals.
Example: "The study focused on the actions of persons in various social settings to understand their interactions better."
Alternatives: "behaviors of individuals" or "conduct of people".
This allows access to the background images which are sufficient for monitoring the actions of persons.
In particular, it is said that we should not interfere with the actions of persons that are based on moral judgments we reject, when the disagreement is not or cannot be rationally resolved.
It seems problematic to think that a significant distinction can be drawn between first and second-generation rights on the ground that the former, but not the latter, simply require that government refrain from interfering with the actions of persons.
Neighborhood/block watch, citizen patrols, community oriented policing, and similar reactions reflect community oriented responses to crime and fear, and reduce crime and fear over a period of time as the community reasserts itself and takes control of the behavior and actions of persons within the community.
In this context, tolerance does not ordinarily mean indifference or absence of disapproval: It means having a policy of not interfering with the actions of persons that are based on moral judgments we reject, when the disagreement is not or cannot be rationally resolved.
Social capital is a multidimensional term used to describe social interactions within communities that promote [ 8] and are embedded within [ 9] norms of trust, reciprocity and social cohesion, which support the actions of persons in these communities [ 10, 11].
The "atoms" within atomistic accounts themselves typically consist of the actions of individual human persons, e.g. conventions as regularities in action.
Federal regulations call for plants to be prepared to deal with "a determined violent external assault, attack by stealth or deceptive actions of several persons".
One might wonder whether this interpretation of surviving duties is compatible with the presupposition that dead people are bearers of neither interests nor rights and that they cannot be affected by the actions of present persons.
As described in [33, 47, 48], a person can develop an empathic understanding of others through mirroring and internal simulation mechanisms, and these mechanisms also influence the individual beliefs and actions of that person.
Of the 93 items, 51 items were related to actions of the person with dementia and 42 were related to the caregivers' actions in situations of assistance during transferring persons with dementia.
