The phrase "actions of directors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the responsibilities, decisions, or behaviors of individuals in leadership positions within an organization or company.
Example: "The actions of directors are crucial in determining the strategic direction of the company."
Alternatives: "decisions made by directors" or "conduct of directors".
If you fail to agree promptly to combine the vote on the Going Private Transaction with the vote on the annual meeting, we anticipate years of litigation will follow challenging the transaction and the actions of those directors that participated in it.
Justice Joseph P. Sullivan, writing for a unanimous court, said the business judgment rule, applied to co-op and condo boards by a 1990 Court of Appeals decision, prohibits courts from second-guessing the actions of corporate directors "taken in good faith and in the exercise of honest judgment in the lawful and legitimate furtherance of corporate purposes".
The report from the comptroller and auditor general, tabled on the last day of the budget session in March, detailed the actions of the director of police.
Is it right that they reward the film's excellence, while decrying the alleged actions of its director?
While a powerful argument can be made that the words and actions of FBI Director Comey caused Hillary Clinton's loss - equally compelling is that Facebook had just as strong an impact influencing voters and causing Trump's election, perhaps more.
Question: Where there is a lawsuit pending against a homeowner association, is that association still legally responsible for the actions of any board director or directors who have harmed any owners or residents of that same association, even if any of those directors who were responsible for the harm have sold all their separate interests and moved away?
This position is vested with broad authority to lead the actions of the independent directors and communicate regularly with the Chief Executive Officer.
Sirius spokesman Patrick Reilly said, "We have no reason to believe this matter involves Sirius or any actions of its officers, directors or employees.
Significant financial loss can be proved to have occurred as a result of the reckless actions of the former director of the SFO".
Mr. Zuma's lawyer, Michael Hulley, told Reuters on Thursday, "I can only speculate that the actions of the national director are fueling and lending credence to the idea that state resources are being used against my client".
