The phrase "action in retaliation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a response or measure taken as a result of a perceived wrong or offense.
Example: "The government took action in retaliation for the cyber attack on its infrastructure."
Alternatives: "response in revenge" or "measure in response".
Canada and Mexico are also taking action in retaliation.
A character has the upper hand as their foe considers taking action in retaliation.
Some of the action in Retaliation is decent, but the lack of blood and pain also means a lack of stakes, consequences, and tension.
Individuals claiming to align themselves with Anonymous undertook protests and other actions (including direct action) in retaliation against anti-digital piracy campaigns by motion picture and recording industry trade associations.
The "audacious legal action" is "in retaliation to the government's plan to install all new computers in China with a filtering software program which can monitor an individual's Internet use".
The agency's acting general counsel, Lafe Solomon, said it was illegal for companies to take actions in retaliation against workers for exercising the right to strike.
After the incident, Tekege said the regional government "put out a letter to the citizens urging them to be calm and not to carry out actions in retaliation".
In a second employment decision issued on Monday, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, the court tightened the legal standard for plaintiffs who assert that they faced adverse employment actions in retaliation for complaining about employment discrimination.
See articleAirbus suggested that a row between Europe and China about the forced participation of its airlines in the European emissions-trading scheme could lead to "suspensions, cancellations and punitive actions" in retaliation.
Prosecutors said the bombings were part of a wave of terrorist actions in retaliation for the Indian Army's 1984 storming of the Golden Temple in Amritsar, Sikhism's holiest shrine in an effort to capture armed Sikh separatists inside.
If North Korea was in fact responsible, as the FBI alleges, its actions — in retaliation for a movie that ridiculed Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un — were petulant, bizarre and deeply irresponsible.
