The lessons drawn from this paper suggest three fundamental principles for designing a promotion strategy and a strategic action framework for implementation.
The role of context has been highlighted, and is one essential part in the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework; implementation success is considered to be a function of evidence, context and facilitation [ 1].
An important principle of the project was to hold to decolonising methodologies [ 18] and apply a participatory action framework [ 19] to ensure that Kwaio voices and Kwaio communities were central to the development and implementation of the project [ 4].
The paper presents framework, implementation and outcomes.
The Action Framework is direct and tactical.
Based on this framework, implementation processes pass through the stages dissemination, adoption, implementation, and continuation.
KT scenarios should be designed to include any part of the knowledge-to-action framework depending on the participants learning needs, provided that it includes the implementation of evidence.
The Joint-Core Team, which was launched along with the request by the ministerial council, has compiled analyses in two reports to clarify technology which should be secured, maintained, and developed in Japan, to share the common targets among industry, government, and academia, and to activate actions under a framework for implementation throughout Japan.
Lessons learned during the action-research implementation, models, and frameworks used are source of inspiration to other wanting to develop or scale-up similar experiences.
Tools to catalyze action and implementation over time.
The approaches based on frameworks for innovations and scaling up pilot projects place less emphasis on initial planning, but stress the processes of learning by doing, embracing error, and linking knowledge-building with action as implementation is occurring.
