The phrase "action conditioned" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to behavior, psychology, or any situation where actions are influenced by specific conditions or stimuli.
Example: "The experiment demonstrated that the subjects were action conditioned to respond to the stimuli presented."
Alternatives: "behaviorally influenced" or "stimulus-driven".
The subject is the person, place, thing or idea we want to express something about; the predicate expresses the action, condition or effect of that subject.
We found that when automatic extrapolation was prevented and the goal was not salient, infants showed predictive gaze shifts only in the efficient action condition.
In Experiment 1, we found that predictive eye movements were elicited by both nonefficient and efficient actions, but anticipation of the outcome occurred much earlier in the efficient action condition.
Their analysis showed that the action condition by itself predicted whether participants added the verbal grouping strategy to their repertoire, while verbalizing the grouping strategy more strongly predicted post-test performance.
The anterior pMNS regions evidenced significant positive dGC values with BA2 during the joint action condition but not the solo conditions, providing further evidence for information flow in the anterior to posterior direction within the pMNS during joint actions.
Likewise, in the execution condition, the experimenter's RL was turned on and off with the same timing as in the joint action conditions without the experimenter being visible.
GLM was performed using separate auditory predictors for the conditions joint action condition to capture brain activity caused by hearing the words "angle" or "straight" and separate action predictor for the joint action, observation and execution conditions to capture brain activity triggered by executing and/or observing the finger movements.
The SMG was the only area that showed a main effect of Condition, with overall stronger responses in the tool action condition than in the insertion action condition.
Such regions should show a specific involvement in the space task of the tool action condition but not in the insertion action condition.
Post hoc t-tests showed that the overall detection probabilities did not differ between the insertion action condition and tool action condition (P = 0.13).
