The phrase "action cite" is not correct in standard written English.
It appears to be an attempt to refer to a citation related to an action, but it lacks clarity and proper usage.
Example: "In the report, I need to include an action cite to support my argument."
Alternatives: "action reference" or "citation for action".
"The plaintiffs in this action cite no case law authority in the history of our nation, nor can the court find any, where a revote or new election was permitted in a presidential race," Judge LaBarga said.
"Those of us who support affirmative action cite two basic reasons: a big gap in income between regions, and the legacy of political power and patronage," said Kim Yon Jung, a sociologist at Chonbuk University.
The class action cites a Reuters report from June last year.
President Mohammed Morsi's office distanced itself from the action, citing the "importance of freedom of expression".
Margarita Lopez, a local councilwoman, had strongly recommended the action, citing differences over land-use issues.
Mr. Franks opposes affirmative action, citing court rulings that have held race-based quotas unconstitutional.
Lawsuits are now seeking to overturn the government's action, citing the Yellowstone population's genetic isolation and the spiritual importance of the species to Native American tribes.
But only when the company's creditors grew anxious about its long-term liability did the board decide to take action, citing new and damning revelations, as reported by Elizabeth A. Harris in the New York Times.
P. L. CRANE, Appt., v. HIRAM W. JOHNSON, Governor of the State of California, et al. Appeal from an order denying an interlocutory injunction, three judges sitting The court took jurisdiction of the action citing Raich v. Truax, 219 Fed.
The Court observed that "the distinction between medical malpractice and negligence claims is subtle" and that "there is no rigid analytical line separating the two causes of action" (citing Estate of French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d 546, 555-56 (Tenn .2011)).
But a three-year inquiry by the Pentagon's Defense Criminal Investigative Service, which ended last August with no action, cited in its final report "numerous technical discrepancies" that "appear to warrant further review".
