The phrase "acting subject" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to grammar, philosophy, or discussions about agency and responsibility.
Example: "In the sentence, the acting subject is the one performing the action of the verb."
Alternatives: "performing agent" or "active subject".
While each tradition has contributed significant theoretical and practical insights, none has been able to provide a complete account of what Anthony Giddens has termed the problem of the acting subject in context.
Or we might take each aspect seriously for what they are worth in their own domains, seeing Spinoza as both a visionary thinker about the physical and a subtle and original theorist of the psychological, but one whose doctrines cannot be squared with each other, or with the sort of naturalism that sees the acting subject as fitting seamlessly into physical nature.
Ethics thus considers the object of consciousness not as something given or even as something constructed by necessary laws of consciousness, but rather as something to be produced by a freely acting subject, consciously striving to establish and to accomplish its own goals and guided only by its own self-legislated laws.
Some room for the thinking acting subject is required.
Well-constructed passive dative sentences contain a prepositional phrase; however, that prepositional phrase contains the name of the otherwise acting subject (usually following the preposition "by").
Beyond these unconscious adjustments the central monitoring of actions is fundamental for the indication of errors (Ridderinkhof et al., 2003) and for the conscious determination if sensory input was generated by the acting subject itself or by another agent.
Thus logic is born from the demand to adhere to common social norms which shape the human herd into a society of knowing and acting subjects.
For Habermas, rationality consists not so much in the possession of particular knowledge, but rather in "how speaking and acting subjects acquire and use knowledge" (TCA, 1: 11).
For Habermas, rationality consists not so much in the possession of knowledge and thus primarily concerned with the consistency and content of one's beliefs, but rather in "how speaking and acting subjects acquire and use knowledge" (Habermas, 1984, 11).
For Habermas, for example, rationality consists not so much in the possession of particular knowledge, but rather in "how speaking and acting subjects acquire and use knowledge" (Habermas 1984, 11).
The position of chronically ill patients as participating and acting subjects will be fostered; this will make a contribution to the improvement of primary health care especially for socially disadvantaged patients by means of a changed, participating communication and increasing competence levels in self-management.
