The phrase "act on warning" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to taking action based on a warning or alert received.
Example: "The team decided to act on warning and implemented the necessary safety measures immediately."
Alternatives: "respond to the warning" or "take action based on the warning".
The basic fiction at the heart of the whole system of regulation by lawsuits is that people read and act on warning labels.
As well as being prime sources of emotional support, they are often in the best position to notice and act on warning signs of suicide in a loved one.
Rather, they are ready to act on warning signs, including anecdotal business reports, that the probabilities of a downturn are too high to ignore.
The department needs to get its house in order and put basic principles and practices at the heart of what it does, with an appropriately qualified and senior person in charge of the project throughout and an accessible leadership team ready and willing to hear and act on warning signs".
Speaking at the center for preventive action at the Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Annan also said the world's failure over a decade to act on warning signs in Afghanistan, battered by political, economic and natural disasters, resulted in the catastrophe of Sept. 11.
Warren Buffet, the legendary investor and one of the wealthiest men in the world, has used exactly the attributes we've explored in this chapter -- intellectual persistence, prudent thinking, and the ability to see and act on warning signs -- to make billions of dollars for himself and the shareholders in his company, Berkshire Hathaway.
"The failure of the coalition government to act quickly on warning signs has created a crisis where schools cannot find enough qualified teachers.
At a Tuesday hearing featuring an EPA official who resigned amid Flint fallout, lawmakers criticized the agency for failing to act on warnings from one of its own scientists that Flint's water was unsafe. .
Moreover, they argue, the issue is not how the intelligence is received but what a president does with it, asserting that Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney did not act assertively enough on warning signs from intelligence agencies before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Peter Clarke is right to describe the government's approach as one of 'benign neglect' – ministers failed to act on warnings they were given in 2010," Hunt said.
He was quick to point out: "Peter Clarke is right to describe the government's approach as one of 'benign neglect' – ministers failed to act on warnings they were given in 2010".
