The phrase "act judicially" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one is referring to making decisions or taking actions in a manner consistent with judicial principles or legal standards.
Example: "The committee must act judicially when reviewing the evidence presented in the case."
Alternatives: "make a judicial decision" or "decide in a judicial manner".
In the absence of an extensive legislative history and because both the IQA and OMB guidelines were silent about whether agency responses were judicially reviewable, some had viewed the act as providing a new avenue for legal challenges of agency decisions across the U.S. government.
Under the new guidelines, the police would be required to use production orders, which are judicially authorised, under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Pace) for applications to see communications data that reveal journalistic sources.
The passage in 1881 of William Gladstone's Land Act, which conceded the principle that fair rents could be judicially determined, presented Parnell with a serious test of statesmanship.
A double irony is in the fire: here is the high court faced with the need to be judicially activist at the federal level to direct state courts to act with judicial restraint.
"As a result of the Second Circuit decision, the USA Freedom Act's modest changes appear even smaller compared to the now judicially recognized problems with the mass collection of Americans' records," the Electronic Frontier Foundation's David Greene and Mark Jaycox wrote in a Tuesday op-ed.
The release was judicially compelled in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
A caller complained about teachers' absence from a village school, another spoke about the delay in getting paid for his work as a laborer under the federal government's National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, a caller complained about a policeman who sought bribe to release the man's extra-judicially detained son.
"The act makes clear," it says in its introductory findings, "that the Geneva Conventions are not a source of judicially enforceable individual rights".
That decision could also be judicially reviewed.
However, the power to judicially create and enforce nonconstitutional rules of procedure and evidence for the federal courts exists only in the absence of a relevant act of Congress.
