The phrase "across propensity" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to describe a tendency or inclination that spans various contexts or situations, but it lacks clarity.
Example: "The study examined the factors that influence behavior across propensity for risk-taking."
Alternatives: "across tendencies" or "throughout inclinations".
To increase transparency in studies reporting propensity scores by using graphical methods that clearly illustrate (1) the number of participant exclusions that occur as a consequence of the analytic strategy and (2) whether treatment effects are constant or heterogeneous across propensity scores.
These protective effects attenuated substantially after multivariate adjustment and when we excluded multiple observations for each individual, declined over time, differed across propensity score quintiles and risk groups, and were unchanged during post-influenza season periods.
Our analysis shows how a specific treatment effect varies across propensity quintiles.
The standardized 24-month AUC values were compared across propensity score matched treatment arms with quantile median regression using Censored Least Absolute Deviations (CLAD) 34, 35 to adjust for the matched pairs.
However, because of substantial heterogeneity of risk estimates across propensity score strata (likely because the propensity score was highly discriminative (that is, a high C statistic) given substantial differences in characteristics between TNF-α inhibitor users and non-users), which violates the basic assumptions of this approach, it was abandoned.
The Cox regression adjustment using the PS as a continuous variable showed that the HR for chemotherapy recipients was 0.76 (95%CI 0.71, 0.82, P < 0.001), and those stratified by the PS quintiles found that it ranged from 0.73 to 0.85 across propensity strata (all P < 0.01).
No single item was consistently associated with gender across all propensity score strata.
As a sensitivity analysis, we also obtained a weighted estimate of the pooled odds ratio across the propensity score strata.
Baseline characteristics after matching are shown in Table 1, demonstrating that comparable baseline characteristics were seen across all propensity score-matched treatment groups.
The pooled odds ratio across the propensity score strata was 2.95 (95% CI, 2.44 to 3.57), which results in an estimated risk difference between school dropouts and completers of 16.7% points (95% CI, 12.2 to 21.3).
