Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "acknowledgement quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the standard or level of acknowledgment given in a particular situation, such as feedback or recognition.
Example: "The acknowledgement quality in the report was lacking, which affected the overall impact of the findings."
Alternatives: "level of acknowledgment" or "standard of recognition".
Exact(1)
In our analysis, we did not explore whether the differences in acknowledgement quality and completeness varied according to the nature of the paper (ie, underpinning vs more applied research).
Similar(59)
"But simply an acknowledgement".
However, the CJEU's decision represents an important acknowledgement invasive qualities of telecommunications metadata in what we are still, quaintly, calling "the digital age".
Besides, they were published in peer-reviewed journals, which represents an acknowledgement of their quality.
To some extent, this autumnal flowering of their work is a quiet acknowledgement of their qualities but, their love of discretion notwithstanding, it is also frustrating that all three projects should be largely internal, and so much to do with subtle adjustments.
The Colombian textile industry has national and international acknowledgements by its quality and tradition.
There was an acknowledgement of the qualities he has at his disposal in the current squad, with Rodgers describing Gerrard and Carragher as "Premier League legends" and name-checking Pepe Reina and Craig Bellamy.
It is indeed by starting from an acknowledgement of these qualities that produce different kinds of territoriality and cannot be standardised on a single plane, that the article suggests it is possible to give shape to an original composition, able to "artistically" express a new urban culture.
When we allow its presence to distract from the enjoyment and acknowledgement of legitimate, solid, quality art we in turn help to bolster very construct we condemn.
As described, there was some variability in the quality of acknowledgement information provided on papers.
All papers were assessed against the inclusion criteria by two reviewers (JT and DD initially, and in a second round, by JB and DM, see acknowledgements), who assessed study quality and met to reconcile any disagreements, discussing these until consensus was reached.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com