The phrase "acknowledged by one" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something has been recognized or accepted by a single individual.
Example: "The findings of the research were acknowledged by one expert in the field, lending credibility to the study."
Alternatives: "recognized by an individual" or "accepted by a single person".
The W.N.B.A.'s inability to fully capitalize on its early successes has been acknowledged by one of its founders, Adam Silver, now the N.B.A. commissioner.
This was acknowledged by one clinician, a physician, as potentially causing confusion.
Being able to translate policy into practice was also acknowledged by one government official as a key issue.
Manipulating billing codes, for example coding a symptom of depression such as "insomnia" instead of "depressive disorders," to receive payment for treating depression was a barrier acknowledged by one clinician.
So, ironically, the adoption of EBM by the scientific community was not based on evidence but on authoritative knowledge, precisely the type of approach EBM was meant to replace, a point recently acknowledged by one of its key proponents, Sackett himself [ 46].
This type of violence was also acknowledged by one other professional association, particularly in situations of competition for professional leadership positions – the loser is frequently persecuted and repeatedly humiliated by the winner, forcing many professionals to look for alternative workplaces in which to practice.
Her speech, albeit impassioned, was acknowledged by no one.
And it has to be acknowledged by now that one doesn't last six years as president of Syria without being at least somewhat clever, politically skilled and strong-willed.
Typically no date is given, time acknowledged by a floating "one day", "not so long ago", or simply by a verb: "I visited", "I crossed to", "while searching unsuccessfully for kangaroos in the bush of Mount Ainslie......
At the end of this phase, each packet of the frame is considered to be acknowledged by at least one device.
In his judgment, Ormond was clear: while one's gender – which he identified as your social role as a man or a woman in society – could be changed in many contexts and even acknowledged by the state, one's sex could never be changed.
