When relevant values conflict, decision makers must rely on developing context-specific agreement in order to achieve priority setting success.
The overarching goal for the three studies was to create a conceptual framework for achieving successful priority setting.
It provides a way of thinking about successful priority setting and the considerations, or components, essential to achieving successful priority setting.
Moreover, Brockner et al 10 outline a number of circumstances in which process fairness is not desirable for the agents or the recipients of decisions, which underlines our doubts that the focus on fair processes is sufficient in achieving legitimacy in healthcare priority setting.
Institutional learning, increased institutionalization of the priorities, more efficient decision making, more consistent decision making, or increased compliance with decisions (i.e. 'buy-in') are valuable, hard to achieve outcomes of successful priority setting.
Greater insight into stakeholders' attitudes and perceptions of achieving successful priority setting could improve the way in which institutions and healthcare organizations set priorities.
A framework is proposed for thematic priority setting through the application of Future-oriented Technology andlysis (for) achievingclearing clear policy impacts by including principles for impact optimisation.
There's no aperture priority setting or shutter priority setting.
