The phrase "achieved findings" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing results or conclusions that have been reached through research or analysis.
Example: "The researchers presented their achieved findings at the conference, highlighting the significance of their work."
Alternatives: "obtained results" or "acquired conclusions".
Achieved findings were verified with Termogravimetric Analysis/Differential Thermal Analysis.
From the achieved findings and from the made remarks, it comes out that further research is needed.
Although statistical significance was not always achieved, findings from known-groups validity analyses indicated that scores on the Revised SCOPA-DC were lower among participants whom did not report experiencing baseline off-time when compared to those whom reported experiencing off-time, further supporting the construct validity of the revised instrument.
As for the changes in expression patterns of nephrin and podocin in TM4 cells following treatment with angiotensin-II and/or candesartan, we achieved findings that angiotensin-II directly acts on Sertoli cells and affects the expression of nephrin and podocin.
The total acid capacity can be achieved finding the cross-point of the two straight lines of the graphical representation of conductivity as a function of the volume of titrant added after every specific period of time.
We provide data on market expansions and the extent to which policy goals are being achieved, finding that public subsidies for purchasing supplemental policies boosted the market, although the effect of this stimulus diminished over time.
Although best attempts were made to achieve rigorous virus selection; lack of randomness in specimen sampling may have introduced bias (both temporal and geographic) that precluded us from achieving findings with significance.
This study was developed and evaluated as an implementation trial in a practical setting in order to establish whether it is possible to achieve findings comparable to the Diabetes Prevention Study [ 4].
Neutrality was achieved, with findings grounded in the interview data and not in any bias, motivation, or interest.
Christakis and Fowler achieved these findings because their central individuals were clearly identifiable in a single defined population (i.e., the Harvard University student body).
Given the high degree of accuracy and objectivity achieved, these findings strongly support the development of RS as a tool capable of assisting pathologists in accurately assessing prostatic tissue.
