Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "achieved a recognition" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct expression would typically be "achieved recognition" without the article "a."
Example: "The scientist achieved recognition for her groundbreaking research in renewable energy."
Alternatives: "gained recognition" or "received recognition."
Exact(10)
Automation technology has matured to a point where a number of other technologies have developed from it and have achieved a recognition and status of their own.
The experimental results on 900 field samples (6 seabird species, and 150 samples of each species) achieved a recognition accuracy of 88.1%, which indicates that the proposed method is effective for automated seabird identification.
The system evaluated on 1692 Urdu ligatures achieved a recognition rate of 92.7%.
Classification using k-nearest neighbor classifier achieved a recognition rate of 89% for 10,000 primary ligatures.
The proposed method achieved a recognition rate of 91.7%, compared with 90.6% using MSLP-GSS, in an artificial environment, and 87.8% compared with 83.8% in a real environment.
Recently introduced wavelet moment (WM) and complex WM (CWM) approaches [41] have achieved a recognition rate of 51.5 and 54.3%, respectively, on FERET_A2 subset, while the proposed ZMmagPhaseLBP descriptor has attained a recognition rate of 77.33%.
Similar(50)
We also achieve a recognition accuracy competitive to the current state-of-the-art multinomial duration model, while gaining a significant reduction in computation.
The star identification method that we present is proven to be robust, achieving a recognition rate of 99.68% when noise levels of up to ±424 μ radians are introduced to the location of the stars.
The proposed technique achieves a recognition rate of 87.8%, compared with 72.5% using a reverberant speech model.
Our proposed technique achieves a recognition rate of 92.26% complete ligature recognition rate (after the association of primary and secondary ligatures) demonstrating its effectiveness.
On ORL 3 category, the performance of the ZMcomponent coupled with that of the LBP/LTP descriptors is better, achieving a recognition rate of 90.0%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com