The phrase "achieve best value" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to procurement, project management, or any situation where maximizing value for resources spent is a goal.
Example: "Our objective is to achieve best value in our upcoming project by carefully evaluating all bids and selecting the most cost-effective option."
Alternatives: "obtain maximum value" or "realize optimal value".
The spokesman added that "in order to use leftover stock and achieve best value for the taxpayer, passports that include the words 'European Union' will continue to be issued for a short period" after the 30 March when the new design passports came in.
The consumer could, of course, aggregate reserved instances, on-demand instance and options together to achieve best value.
"They help us drive efficiency and achieve best value for taxpayers — any allegations of this not being achieved will be investigated".
She added: "For too long these two central departments have been half-hearted in their dealings with spending departments and have failed to achieve best value for the taxpayer.
Its aim is to inform the formulation of safe, effective, health policies that are patient focused and seek to achieve best value" [ 1].
They needed to secure high quality services which remained safe for patients, whilst at the same time trying to achieve best value for the budgets available.
Our data suggest that whereas increasing IAP raises the PEEP level needed to achieve the best lung compliance, prone repositioning does not consistently influence the PEEP level needed to achieve "best" values for CLUNG and avoid negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures determined using an esophageal balloon catheter.
He believed strongly in achieving best value for the NHS and was fearless in leading reorganisation where required.
She said the Department for Business and the Treasury could not demonstrate that they were "achieving best value for taxpayers' money".
The HCA said it would review 522 new affordable homes that were planned "to determine which of those can be funded with available resources based on the aim of maximising affordable housing and achieving best value for money".
Lawyer David Wollfe, from Matrix chambers, says because the second "private" process didn't follow the same procedure as the first, it could have been open to legal challenge and couldn't be said safely to have achieved best value for the taxpayer.
