The phrase "achieve a comparison of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of evaluating or contrasting two or more items, concepts, or data sets.
Example: "In this study, we aim to achieve a comparison of the effectiveness of different teaching methods."
Alternatives: "make a comparison of" or "conduct a comparison of".
Additionally, the access to testing protocols and results performed by manufacturers and importers needs to be extended for research issues in order to achieve a comparison with results of independent research.
In our study, community-based recruitment helped us stay in touch and "give back" to the community from which we were recruiting, while supplementing the RDD controls to achieve a comparison group more representative of the general target population.
The method contains a well-chosen subset of all possible test condition combinations and can achieve a balanced comparison of levels of any factor [ 34- 36].
In the present work we produce mixed (15 nm contrasted with 100 nm) nanotube microstructures that combine highly defined micro- and nanostructures using a photolithographic approach to achieve a direct comparison of adhesion and spreading of mesenchymal stem cells on different diameter nanotubes present on a single surface.
To achieve a quantitative comparison of the methods, we look at three properties (in order of decreasing importance): 1. Reliability: how many of the known SSCs does the method correctly detect?
In order to achieve a valid comparison of these therapies in a future randomised study, a validated disease-specific instrument for the assessment of symptomatic outcome for claudicants is required.
We aim to build survival predictors on a common data set to achieve a fair comparison of the gene sets.
Additional experiments using biological replicates and materials prepared from 6-week lenses would be necessary to achieve a direct comparison of differential gene expression in 1-day and 6-week old Pax6 heterozygous lenses.
To achieve a fair comparison of the four methods, each method was re-trained and had the SVM parameters optimised (utilising a cross-validation on the training set) for every experiment.
This is the first clinical study to achieve a direct comparison of the associations between anti-nucleosome, high-avidity anti-dsDNA and anti-α-actinin levels and outcomes of renal disease in patients with LN followed longitudinally.
