The phrase "achievable for example" is not correct in standard written English.
It can be used when providing an example of something that can be accomplished or attained, but it needs to be restructured for clarity.
Example: "The goals we set are achievable; for example, increasing our sales by 20% this quarter."
Alternatives: "attainable, for instance" or "feasible, such as".
Because the theory predicts that the single-frame loss can be exponentially decreased as a function of R, the high-fidelity holographic transport is achievable: for example, when we consider an empirically defined movable region of R>0.96, which is about 180 nm step, the fidelity after a 5 μm transport can exceed ∼0.99.
We emphasize that this level of accuracy is practically achievable, for example, the recent proposals [18 21] provide cost-effective mechanisms for an up to 55 dB reduction in the self-interference coefficient.
Given that institutions realizing the prior principles are already in place, this should be approximately achievable by, for example, varying marginal rates of tax and exemptions.
Industrial standards for life-supporting medical devices (International Electrotechnical Commission [IEC] Standard 60060-1-2) fall shortantially shoft of achievable standards – for example, for military equipment (MIL-STD-461).
This is why it's important to write a list of your goals (it's important they are achievable -- some you can even achieve next week for example) and start to tick off those ones you achieved.
where Δ i,j denotes the effect of small cell j against small cell i, the SINR or the achievable rate loss, for example.
Others may not be easily achievable; restructuring Social Security, for example, could be a 10-year project.
Furthermore, the many different deposition systems and processes which have been developed introduce further complications in regard to (for example) achievable coating uniformity and deposition rates.
At a detection rate of 65%, for example, (achievable using five-yearly Framingham screening with a 20% 10-year CVD risk cut-off) the false positive rates are 7% for annual Framingham screening, 9% for five-yearly Framingham screening and 12% for age screening.
A further cause of disagreement is the question of cost: a new drug may be clinically effective and better than existing drugs or a placebo, but so costly that an equivalent or greater health gain may be achievable by other means, for example, better screening to detect the disease at an early stage.
With larger K c, cluster rotation is more effective at increasing the sum rate; for example, the achievable gains with T cl =100 are 1.4% and 3.2% for K c =4 and 12, respectively, using PF scheduling.
