The phrase "accurately excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that has been precisely or correctly left out or omitted from a context or situation.
Example: "The data that was inaccurately reported has been accurately excluded from the final analysis."
Alternatives: "correctly omitted" or "precisely left out".
Indeed, the absence of coronary calcium accurately excluded the presence of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 1 diabetes.
For symptomatic patients, the method is somewhat more controversial (20); however, in these patients, a high CCS has been reported to identify symptomatic patients with a high risk of structural coronary artery stenosis as determined by CAG, whereas a low CCS accurately excluded patients with significant coronary artery stenosis (<1%) (21).
MRI can accurately exclude parametrial invasion, with a negative predictive value ranging from 94 100%[200, 36].
Therefore, a simple evaluation of the patient's ventilation showing high respiratory rate can allow to accurately exclude a "complete PEEP-absorber" behavior.
Of the tested sera 56% were completely negative in a highly sensitive neutralization assay, which very accurately excludes false negative results and has been described previously [51].
We then excluded the claims with MRDx of malignancies because we could not accurately exclude the cancer patients admitted for palliative care.
In addition, a negative axillary ultrasound accurately excludes advanced nodal disease (≥4 lymph node metastases) with a negative predictive value of 93 96 % [ 16, 17].
Importantly, our assay does not amplify the D4Z4 arrays with non-permissive B-type subtelomeres and accurately excludes the arrays with non-permissive A-type subtelomeres.
Thus, by more accurately excluding disease at sites of residual structural abnormality, PET/CT could allow patient reassurance and avoid unnecessary salvage therapies.
The ability of ANNs to accurately exclude the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients without true appendicitis was significantly better than clinical performance and an Alvarado score ≥ 6.
5 A systematic review published in 2003 confirmed that the Ottawa ankle rules accurately exclude ankle and mid-foot fractures in patients with ankle injuries and can reduce the number of unnecessary radiographs by 30-40%.
