The phrase "accurate efficiency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the precision or effectiveness of a process, system, or method in achieving desired results.
Example: "The new software has demonstrated accurate efficiency in processing data, significantly reducing the time required for analysis."
Alternatives: "precise effectiveness" or "optimal performance".
Despite the relevance for an accurate efficiency assessment, the influence of the groundwater exchanges has not been previously addressed.
In order to calculate the annual produced energy of system with high accuracy, the accurate efficiency model and power equations are used for inverter and PV module, respectively.
Accurate efficiency characterisations and cascade summing correction factors are crucial for quantifying the radionuclides present in environmental samples, and these were calculated for the complex geometry posed by the well detector using two different methodologies.
The proposed method is based solely on Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) nuclear data, an X-ray energy library, and accurate efficiency characterisations for single detector counting geometries.
As the radiative efficiency of these individual cells increases, radiative coupling between the stacked cells becomes an increasingly important factor not only in cell design, but also in accurate efficiency measurement and in determining performance of cells and systems under varying spectral conditions in the field.
The last step is to apply the symmetrization correction so that the EEFRAC file will yield an accurate extraction efficiency.
Moreover, an experimental system was constructed to achieve the accurate current efficiency of the new system.
The use of the proximity ratio as the measured variable in our calibration necessitates an additional consideration to ensure accurate FRET efficiency deduction in heterozygous diploid strains.
Experimental feeds were delivered in excess by automatic disc feeders with an automated uneaten feed collection system in order to determine accurate feed efficiency.
This can be explained that slight Ct value determination error was multiplied (E-ΔCt) to such an extension that deviation of extreme ratio sample (9 1 or 1 9) was larger in the SDM method assuming the accurate amplification efficiency values were obtained in this method.
In order for normalization and multianalyte GPS result calculation to be accurate, amplification efficiencies of individual gene assays were required to be similar [ 24], defined as the median ± 20%.
