The phrase "accuracy or fairness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the importance of either precision or impartiality in a particular context, such as reporting, analysis, or decision-making.
Example: "In journalism, the debate often centers around the balance between accuracy or fairness in reporting the news."
Alternatives: "precision or impartiality" or "correctness or equity".
Errors are understood to arise from idiosyncratic circumstances; they are addressed primarily through complaints, and complaints are understood to raise primarily issues of individual accuracy or fairness.
Subject to virtually no standards of accuracy or fairness, political advertising enjoys a reprieve from the checks and balances of accountability that virtually every other advertiser is held to.
That doesn't mean it's brought greater accuracy or fairness.
Our experiment was not intended to address the accuracy or fairness of coverage in the traditional media, nor the breadth of coverage or the fairness of the totality of sources available online.
Journalism- Read radical thinker Noam Chomsky's discussion of terrorism entitled "The Journalist from Mars," presented at the fifteenth anniversary celebration of the media watchdog organization, FAIR, or Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (//www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Chomsky/Journalist_Mars.html).html
"We will be committed to truth and accuracy; fairness and balance … The Sunshine Newspaper will celebrate our heroes".
Only the Guardian vigorously pursued the leads of the hacking story and methodically stuck with it for months and years, never ignoring the underlying context of how Rupert Murdoch conducted his take-no-prisoners business and journalism without regard for the most elemental standards of fairness, accuracy or balance, or even lawful conduct.
The Enquirer publisher, Harry M. Whipple, and editor, Lawrence K. Beaupre, declined to answer questions about the accuracy and fairness of the stories or the circumstances surrounding the apology.
"Programmes featuring satire and particularly political satire would necessarily be allowed substantially more leeway in their approach to accuracy and fairness than, for example, news or a current affairs programme.
They maintain their work strengthens rather than damages the credibility of their news outlets, showing the reader or viewer that it cares about accuracy, about fairness, about getting the story right.
Accuracy and fairness were not pursued with the vigor Times readers have a right to expect.
