The phrase "accuracy of the conversion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the precision or correctness of a process that transforms data from one format to another.
Example: "We need to ensure the accuracy of the conversion to avoid any data loss during the transfer."
Alternatives: "precision of the conversion" or "correctness of the conversion".
The number of the candidate sentences was set to 2, the accuracy of the conversion reached 0.59.
The accuracy of the conversion can be computed as a ratio of the correct motions to the test motions.
In the case that the number of the candidate sentences was set to 1, the accuracy of the conversion was 0.34.
The accuracy of the conversion of 0.34, 0.59, 0.64, 0.68 and 0.71 were obtained from one, two, three, four and five candidate sentences respectively.
Similarly, minute-by-minute regression equations from a mechanical set up carried over a short period of time (such as Esliger and Tremblay [ 14]) could be generated, but the accuracy of the conversions would be reduced over time unless the internal clocks were kept calibrated to each other.
In the present study, we performed a CPRD to CDM conversion, evaluated the accuracy of this conversion and further assessed the adequacy of the conversion by attempting to replicate a prior published study by Schlienger et al. [ 8] in the raw CPRD data and the CPRD CDM.
In addition, as a case study, a practical map is converted among three petroleum standards (the Chinese Petroleum, Shell and USGS standards), which are frequently adopted in the petroleum industry, so as to illustrate the conversion accuracy and applicability of the conversion system.
The accuracy of predicting conversion from early-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to the advanced stages of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) or geographic atrophy (GA) was evaluated to determine whether inclusion of clinically relevant genetic markers improved accuracy beyond prediction using phenotypic risk factors alone.
Most of other measurement applications of AD-converters request mainly a great relative accuracy of conversion, but the absorbance is computed as a logarithm of the measured ratio between the measurement and the reference optical sensor response.
To assess the accuracy of our conversions, we calculated the average Pearson's r between the predicted values and actual experimental values for each platform and replicate.
Finally, the kinetic analysis of the experimental results showed a non-negligible dependence of the kinetic parameters on carbon conversion and in particular the poor accuracy of the shrinking-core model at low conversion degree.
