The phrase "accuracy of items" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the precision or correctness of specific items, such as data points, products, or information.
Example: "The accuracy of items in the inventory is crucial for maintaining proper stock levels."
Alternatives: "precision of items" or "correctness of items".
The dependent variables were the number and output-bound accuracy of items recalled.
Inter-rater agreement regarding the accuracy of items was substantial.
The role and diagnostic accuracy of items from the clinical history were not examined.
The accuracy of items recorded is considered good (Gissler and Haukka 2004), but validity concerning orthopedic diagnoses and procedures has not been assessed.
The total time to complete the 12 shapes was recorded and the accuracy of items was scored with one point for every correct line segment.
In light of these findings, the relative performance of common survey designs are discussed and design lessons are drawn in order to enhance the accuracy of item-specific consumption reporting and, consequently, measures of total household food consumption.
For dichotomous items, if H is calculated on the transposed data matrix then we obtain a measure summarizing the accuracy of item ordering within a scale [ 27].
These authors propose similar rules of thumb for the interpretation of H T : values of H T below 0.3 indicate that the item ordering is too inaccurate to be practically useful; 0.3 ≤ H T < 0.4 means somewhat low accuracy; 0.4 ≤ H T < 0.5 represents only medium accuracy; and values over 0.5 indicate high enough (sufficient) accuracy of item ordering within a scale [ 14].
Finally, we have not performed item response theory analysis as the English version of the AS-20 has undergone such analysis; addition of such analyses will be helpful to remove inappropriate items and hence to improve the accuracy of the items.
This can be deconfounded with two between-subjects comparisons which revealed that items first output on an earlier test were significantly more accurate than those output first on a later test (t [175.02] = 2.08, p = .04); however, the accuracy of reminisced items did not depend on when an item was first output (t [205.93] = 0.23, p = .82).82
Some of these comparisons can be made on a between-subjects basis, which allows us to control for the time of first output when comparing the accuracy of reminisced items from Group A with consistently recalled and forgotten items from Group B. In the between-subjects comparison, consistently recalled items again revealed higher accuracy than reminisced items (t [38.09] = 3.83, p < .001).001
