The phrase "accuracy of change" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the precision or correctness of modifications or transformations in various contexts, such as data analysis, project management, or scientific research.
Example: "The accuracy of change in the experimental results was crucial for validating our hypothesis."
Alternatives: "precision of modification" or "correctness of alteration".
This classifier, the Spatial Temporal Markovian Support Vector Classifier, exhibits an entirely new level of accuracy of change detection when evaluated for the classification of seven Landsat images from an Appalachian Ohio study area.
The accuracy of change in jitter measured with other electrodes has yet to be determined.
Time series methods that consider longer periods of disturbance and recovery may improve the accuracy of change detection [50], especially for retrospective analyses to establish historic baselines.
The proposed REDD+ MRV complimentary system is found enhancing information content and accuracy of change reporting, many fold reduction in cost, assessing efficacy of community forest regimes against non-community forest regimes, extending spatial framework to couple local systems to national monitoring systems.
Time series methods that consider longer periods of disturbance and recovery may improve the accuracy of change detection [ 50], especially for retrospective analyses to establish historic baselines.
The accuracy of change point estimation depends on sample size, location of the change point, and extent to which the relationship is modified before and after the change point.
The results obtained show that the proposed measure is a useful indicator and can be complementary to existing object-oriented metrics for improving the accuracy of change-proneness prediction when the system contains high degree of inheritance relationships and polymorphism.
The accuracy of changes and prognostication of FDG-PET were validated by subsequent clinical follow-up.
Planned contrast showed that there was no difference between conjunction change and no change on accuracy or RT, ps >0.5; the accuracy of total change was significantly lower than that of no change, F 1,12) = 7.164, p = 0.02, suggesting that the total change distracted the judgment to the "no change" response; no difference was found between total change and no change on RT, p>0.5.
The accuracy of relevant change was lower than that of no change, F 1,14) = 10.136, p = 0.007, suggesting that the change of gap orientation is harder to detect compared to no change.
Planned contrast showed that the accuracy of irrelevant change was significantly lower than that of no change, F 1,15) = 4.672, p = 0.047, and the RT of irrelevant change was also considerably longer than that of no change, F 1,15) = 4.770, p = 0.045, suggesting the change of irrelevant dimension impaired the performance.
