Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
D is the degree of accuracy (expressed as a proportion).
The degree of accuracy expressed as a proportion, was calculated as 0.00523.
Accuracy, expressed as the mean extraction recovery, was between 87% and 95%.
The accuracy expressed as recovery was calculated by the ratio of the measured concentration data to its nominal level.
The accuracy (expressed as mean relative error MRE) was within ±5.8% and the precision (expressed as relative standard error RSD) was less than 5.9%.
Precision and accuracy, expressed as relative standard deviation and relative error, respectively, were of the order of 3 5%, while the detection limit for each element was around 10−9M.
Similar(35)
Intra- and inter-day accuracies expressed as a percentage of deviation from the respective nominal value.
The method proved to be precise (intra-day precision expressed as %RSD in human plasma ranged from 2.9 - 3.2% and inter-day precision expressed as %RSD ranged from 3.4 - 3.8%) and accurate (intra-day accuracies expressed as % error in human urine ranged from -3.3 - 2.8% and inter-day accuracies ranged from -3.3 - 1.7%).
For example, Saatchi et al. [ 5] reported accuracies (expressed as the genetic correlation between the trait and its DGV) in Limousin (n ~ 2900, depending on the trait) and Simmental (n ~ 1700, depending on the trait) cattle of 0.56 to 0.59 for HCW, 0.98 for FT, 0.63 to 0.65 for MARB, 0.59 to 0.63 for REA, 0.53 for WBSF, and 0.62 to 0.67 for YG.
Overall accuracy and Area-weighted accuracy are expressed in percent.
Predictive accuracy was expressed as the mean accuracy obtained from SVM applied across all cross-validation runs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com