The phrase "accuracy deviation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to measurements, statistics, or quality control to describe the difference between a measured value and the true value.
Example: "The accuracy deviation in the experiment was within acceptable limits, indicating reliable results."
Alternatives: "measurement error" or "precision discrepancy."
The results are compared in terms of the convergence speed, accuracy, deviation from the desired response, minimum stop-band attenuation and maximum pass-band attenuation.
The predicted resonant frequency is compared with published results based on both analytical and experimental investigation, which shows a good engineering accuracy (deviation of ±12%) with a vast variation of parameters.
Furthermore, there was no accuracy deviation between the cooperative and uncooperative settings for SIAME.
The accuracy (deviation less than 30% from the sGFR) of the eGFRRBF was significantly better than those from traditional eGFR equations, such as the Jelliffe-1973-equation Jelliffe-1973-equation Jelliffe-1973-equation
In mathematical terms, we allow for the probability that a food source is in the nearby area to deviate from 1. Initially, this probability was set to be very close to one (within numerical accuracy, deviation from 1 was ∼10−100).
The 45∘ monitor angle showed the worst accuracy and deviation, the 0∘ monitor angle showed the best accuracy and smallest deviation with the upper target.
Hence, the efficiency of processing data is improved without compromising the accuracy of deviation evaluation.
Moreover, the binding affinities of 13 further spirocyclic σ1 ligands were predicted with reasonable accuracy (mean deviation in pKi ≈ 0.8).
Laboratory calibration showed that water level could be measured with sufficient accuracy (standard deviation <2 mm) for a range of applications in hydrology.
The accuracy (percentage deviation of the concentration determined relative to the calculated concentration) and the precision (standard deviation/coefficient of variation) of methods always fell within accepted ranges (± 15% of the mean).
Table 6 Performance of different procedures for recognition of local image features Feature Average accuracy Standard deviation SIFT 78.9 0.7 cLBP 74.5 1.1 SIFT + cLBP 82.0 0.9 The combination of SIFT and cLBP improves performance a lot.
