Sentence examples for accs I from inspiring English sources

These genes were non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (P), cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (C), glutathione S-transferase (G), ACCS (I), dipeptidase (J), methyl transferases (M and N), thioredoxin reductase (T).

A non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (P), a thioredoxin reductase (T), a transcriptional regulator (Z) and a transporter (A) occurred in both, and in the case of G. zeae, an ACCS (I) also (Fig. 2).

Cosmid libraries of these two fungi were screened with a homologue of ACCS (I) and cosmids that hybridised, and had several of the common ETP cluster genes, were sequenced and analysed.

Eight of these genes encode enzymes with high similarity to a two module non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (P); thioredoxin reductase (T); O-methyl transferase (M); a methyl transferase with unknown specificity (N); glutathione S-transferase (G); cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (C); amino cyclopropane carboxylate synthase (ACCS) (I); and a dipeptidase (J).

Individuals with a high learning rate within ACC (i.e. learning from errors, adapting the following behavior to circumvent unwanted consequences in future) resemble the known patterns of the model: the higher the probability to commit an error the higher the activity within ACC.

The ACC for node i is defined as (1) ACC i = 2 C i d i (d i − 1 ).

If a prediction method yields high ACC i with small i and low ACC i with large i, it is deemed as an effective prediction.

It is obvious that ACC i is the ratio of correct ith order predicted samples to all samples.

G-mean computes the geometric mean of all classes' accuracies and is described as follows: (14) G -mean = (∏ i = 1 C Ac c i ) 1 / C, where Acc i denotes the accuracy of the ith class.

Furthermore, inconsistent with the functional specialization of dorsal and ventral regions of the ACC (i.e., cognitive vs. emotional processing, respectively; see, e.g., Bush et al., 2000), the results of the present study showed stimulus differentiation for the conditionable participants relative to the unconditionable participants within the dorsal ACC, but not within the rostral ACC.

To evaluate the correctness of the candidate indication, the ith order prediction accuracy was calculated by (6) ACC i = P D i N,   i = 1, 2, …, 56, where N denoted the total number of samples, while PD i denoted the number of samples whose ith order prediction is correct.