The phrase "accreditation to develop" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the process of obtaining official recognition or certification to create or enhance something, such as a program or a skill.
Example: "The organization received accreditation to develop new training programs for its employees."
Alternatives: "authorization to create" or "certification to enhance".
Auditing and accreditation programs encourage RECs to develop standardized policies and procedures, which helps promote the consistent application of ethical principles.
One way to assure quality at the transnational level is to develop "dual accreditation": degrees offered offshore are accredited by both the offering education provider's accrediting body and the professional body of the country in which the offering is being delivered.
More recently, employer bodies in several tourism industry sectors, namely, retail travel, meetings and inbound, have acted to develop individual accreditation schemes designed to confer a level of professional standing upon individuals working in their respective sectors.
However, in Denmark there is no systematic training or accreditation for GPs who wish to develop their competence in the assessment of child wellbeing [ 4].
The case study in Table 2 highlights some of the lessons learned from the national improvement journey in Thailand.> Another approach to address basic levels of quality improvement, especially in smaller and resource-poor facilities, is to develop an accreditation system that takes into account that not all providers will ever be able to meet the same set of standards.
In Afghanistan, a similar endorsement of the initiative to develop a new accreditation system for midwifery education by the government and Ministry of Public Health--by ceding regulatory authority to the accreditation board--most likely helped in expediting the programme [ 26].
While no federal agency develops its own credentials, Mr. Knight said the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission had authorized his organization as the sole body to develop standards for accreditation for gap year programs.
If Udacity were to develop a worthwhile accreditation system, that could change.
However, it needs to develop and implement accreditation process as par the signatory countries.
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, institutions were created to develop voluntary program accreditation at the undergraduate and graduate levels, including the Commission for the Evaluation of Undergraduate Programs (CEUP) in 1999 and the Commission for the Evaluation of Postgraduate Programs in 2000.
