The phrase "accreditation against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of evaluating or certifying something based on specific standards or criteria.
Example: "The organization received accreditation against international quality standards, ensuring its commitment to excellence."
Alternatives: "accreditation based on" or "certification according to".
Accordingly further research on the clinical impact of these programs is needed, and it is important to weigh the transactional opportunity and financial costs of accreditation against other financial investments in quality improvement interventions [ 45– 45].
Former research has identified four principal models and national variants of external evaluation, e.g. medical speciality-driven visitation, traditional accreditation against explicit standards, European Quality Awards based on the model of the European Foundation of Quality Management (EFQM), and certification using ISO standards (ISO 9000 series)[ 1].
11 A second study examined accreditation performance against the consumer involvement in health services, reporting no relationship between the two.
Manne's proposal for a new law school, however, drew the ire of incumbent law schools in upstate New York, which lobbied against accreditation of the new program.
ISQua conducts the International Accreditation Program IAPP) for the certification or accreditation of standards against their standards [ 5].
Concerns about rigidity have raised questions about whether accreditation actually works against efforts to improve quality [ 24].
33 However, we can analyse data before and after introduction of new standards, review indicator activity against accreditation scores and analyse changes over time.
(iv) Information about all accredited suppliers against which the accreditation organization has taken remedial or adverse action, including revocation, withdrawal, or revision of the supplier's accreditation.
Has the service been given a reasonable opportunity to present a case against the Accreditation Decision that was made?
This requires ADRC to possess procedural rules to enable the service to have a fair hearing and be given a reasonable opportunity to present a case against the Accreditation Decision that was made and in particular, the opportunity to inspect and respond to any documentation that was referred to in making the original Accreditation Decision (Douglas, 2006, p. 200).
