Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(16)
One of the most influential recent pragmatic accounts of explanation is associated with constructive empiricism.
Two accounts of explanation emerged: the unificationist and the causal-mechanical.
His "conjecture" nicely captures much (although perhaps not all)of what is at issue between pragmatic and traditional, not purely non-pragmatic accounts of explanation.
Notice that in both cases these are relationships or patterns of the sort that traditional accounts of explanation attempt to capture.
This dynamical understanding, as Kellert denotes it, achieved by chaos models would suggest that typical causal accounts of explanation are aimed at a different level of understanding.
Laws of nature play an important role in many accounts of explanation, most prominently in the deductive-nomological model and the unification approach.
Similar(43)
Its principal merits lay in the avoidance of any reliance on causal concepts and in the ability to give an account of explanation in areas of theoretical science in which talk of causation seems strained.
What should one expect from an account of explanation?
The unification account of explanation has been defended within a more detailed cognitive pragmatist approach.
If this were all there was to the story of chaos explanations, then a causal account of explanation looks more promising.
For instance, Sandborg (1997, 1998) tests van Fraassen's account of explanation as answers to why-questions by using cases of mathematical explanation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com