Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "accounted for error" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be missing a preposition or article, such as "an" or "the," to clarify the meaning.
Example: "The accounted-for error in the calculations was minimal."
Alternatives: "considered error" or "factored-in error."
Exact(1)
We accounted for error variation inherent in measurement of element concentrations in the samples, with both quality control and twin samples contributing to the maximum-likelihood estimation of and adjustment for day effects [see Supplemental Material (doi 10.1289/ehp.0901541) for additional details].
Similar(59)
According to Prof Li Shi, director of Beijing Normal University's institute of income distribution who works on Chip, that's mostly accounted for errors in targeting by the government.
Back then, maybe an openly acknowledged and accounted for error-rate could have saved us - our jobs, our savings, our pension funds, our homes.
These steps are designed to account for error information associated with the included observation sets during the assimilation process.
When Japanese car manufacturers were accounting for error, they would know whose team worked on what and the whole team would take the blame.
By combining data from multiple GPS receivers and other location sensors, then accounting for error in the devices' estimates, the system pinpoints users' locations much more accurately than GPS alone, to within a foot of where they really are.
And mental anomalism is claimed to be necessary for accounting for error and thus meaning and content.
Nicholas Butterfield, a paleobiologist at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom, acknowledges that the researchers did attempt to account for error.
Any direct theory of perception must account for error: If we perceive the world directly, how is it that we make mistakes about it?
We recommend culturing 28 32 fe (equalized among brood pools) to account for error in fe estimation.
The process of extracting RNA was cumbersome, with a process standardized as much as possible, but could account for error.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com