The phrase "accountable for determining" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is responsible for making decisions or judgments about a particular matter.
Example: "The project manager is accountable for determining the timeline and budget for the project."
Alternatives: "responsible for deciding" or "liable for assessing".
Countless details need to be addressed in the plan of care from deciding who will be accountable for medications, determining how day to day care will be provided, ordering and delivering the needed medical equipment to assessing the family dynamics, discussing funeral plans, and establishing long term goals for the patient and his or her family and friends.
They specified the work involved and who was accountable for it, determined which external stakeholders' support was essential, allocated responsibility for building relationships, and developed messages and methods for sharing results with the rest of the organization.
Arno Sinjewel is accountable for determination of plasma haloperidol levels.
Gallani also wants to look into why there aren't more government regulations to hold compensation consultants accountable for their role in determining CEO pay.
Richard Sideman President American Jewish Committee New York, Sept. 17, 2009 To the Editor: Richard Goldstone expresses deep concern regarding the "corrosive effect on international justice" and the "unacceptable hypocrisy" of not holding Israel accountable for what he has determined are possible war crimes in Gaza.
It also makes it trickier for voters to hold politicians accountable for decisions, since most spending is determined by abstract formulae.All the same, the initiative process is a mixed bag, not an unmitigated disaster.
As Justice Kennedy wrote, "With the advent of the Internet, prompt disclosure of expenditures can provide shareholders and citizens with the information needed to hold corporations and elected officials accountable for their positions... Shareholders can determine whether their corporation's political speech advances the corporation's interest in making profits".
It could be hypothesised that the extent to which both parties are willing to collaborate over safety-related issues (for example by holding each other mutually accountable for adhering to prescribing procedures) is determined by the level of interpersonal or professional trust that they have in each other.
MG may be determined to hold AT&T accountable for its embarrassingly bad iPhone service.
Therefore, the hospital needs to explicitly determine who should be accountable for which aspect of priority setting.
