The phrase "accountability regime" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing systems or frameworks that ensure responsibility and transparency, often in governance or organizational settings.
Example: "The new accountability regime implemented by the government aims to enhance transparency and public trust."
Alternatives: "accountability framework" or "responsibility system".
Conduct Auth., Press Release, New accountability regime for banks and insurers comes into force (Mar. 7, 2016), available at https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/new-accountability-regime-banks-and-insurers-comes-force.
Flint's letter made clear that Trueman did harbour misgivings about the new accountability regime for bank directors.
Chris Keates, general secretary of the NASUWT teaching union said: "Ofqual's report has highlighted the poisonous relationship between the qualifications system and the accountability regime.
This paper analyses the development of a transnational accountability regime, – the Generally Accepted Principles and Practices (GAPP), introduced in 2008 for sovereign wealth funds.
He adds: "The outcomes of tables feed into the accountability regime (Ofsted) and therefore matter greatly to schools and their heads.
I focus here on the struggles leading to the establishment of the boundaries of the GAPP accountability regime by diagnosing the accountability problem, determining the providers and the imagined users of the accounts and defining the appropriate course of action.
The nature of the accountability regime-public, market or community-in economic governance is also addressed.
As the corporate accountability regimes expand into such areas as social and environmental responsibility, these information systems must also expand in order to meet the requisite information needs.
I further elaborate on the implications of the fall-back to transparency in transnational accountability regimes as a last resort and the types of resistance emerging against it.
A more comprehensive understanding of organizational context increases the likelihood that AIS will provide the information necessary to support the more inclusive accountability regimes arising from an expanding notion of acting in the public interest.
The Article concludes that in economic governance we see both a hybridity of governance processes and of accountability regimes-this is to be expected given the mix of hard and soft norms and their re-balancing following reforms.
